I know it’s no RAW on GIMP it’s clearly says on Darktable “export to GIMP after close” So if GIMP can load RAW they don’t use Darktable and if they use Darktable for load RAW after Darkatable export it’s not a RAW. GIMP doesn’t.īasic it’s always better to use RAW and compress after you do what you want with the picture Since you don’t say specifically why you “must” use a raw, I don’t know what you’re trying to accomplish, but if you really have to edit a raw image, then you need to do that in darktable (or rawtherappee, or other raw converters) that actually use the raw image. So, once you have it in GIMP, it isn’t a raw image any more. That includes all the same steps the camera does to convert the raw to a jpeg: denoise, white balance, etc. You’re using darktable to develop the raw image and convert it into something gimp can edit. You’re not just using darktable to load a raw image into GIMP. That’s because you aren’t doing what you think you are doing. Originaly I use it only to load RAW in GIMP for make an other base work to AI again in upscale. I must have misspoken, I only say for unknow reason Darktable apply is personal setting on the base picture to give a result that is not realistic as show in my first picture(head bezel are not purple). Quick edit, I’ve identify issu, It’s Darktable who apply auto white balance, don’t know how remove this auto change but i can change manuel each pics If anyone knows how to fix this problem I take. Seem be white balance change on the GIMP picture white are white. I don’t see when on Darktable or GIMP the option take decision to change colorimetry O_0 On the center you see the RAW pics after AI software job in Darktable software obligation to work RAW picture in GIMP2 software for the last work on pics and conversion on PNG/JPG to share.ĭarktable is required to load a RAW file into GIMP, but for unknow reason they load picture in GIMP with this colorimetry. The image at left is the original photo in JPEG record at the same time as the RAW in the camera.īut for work with pretty nice quality on software I need to use the RAW. Here is my problem, the image on the right is my final rendering in GIMP2 and the colorimetry has changed without me understanding why, without understanding how to put it back original. I’ve buy Niwalker ES3 create a topic to speak about this light, and in addition to my first impression I also wanted to share some photo Which brings me to a first problem I submit to you, if anyone has an idea. I have enough for today and probably tomorrow You can see the difference with RAW+ AI work on this point We can see i’ve only focus on the blue bezel (to make real blue JPG is little exaggerated on his color), other color are very decrease especially the red on the ES3 top head.įor the quality/resolution/detail improve by AI it’s nice keep in mind that my basic photo is not perfect I can improve it in several points for better difference JPG/ final work. Look this interface, thanks the 400 page PDF for basique explain of this software Ok, after cry a lot I think i’m able to correct the auto correction of Darktable (But I still do not understand and especially how to remove the auto correction, finaly I had to change many color parameters and not only the white balance) If you have any comment or suggestion you can Or just give your opinion on the general project it also suits me. If you have any suggestion advice and other I take The setting of software are most difficult compare to the camera I am focused on moving video, static video is less problematic.ĪïeAïeAïeouilleouille as have said on my countryĪ lot of information, setting to learn all at once and more than a camera with a really no translation that does not help me in setting and a MASSIVE issu with software when I can make a good photo.So it’s impossible and i’m in reflexion for the utility to invest in new configuration to give me the means to do something nice. I’m proudly has an average of 6 seconde/frame … for a first draft who goes into training another (without touching the colorimetry of the video ) all in a fairly high noise. After make a stable video I have for project enhance video by artificial intelligence, good result just need massive “power” processing/computing power AKA Graphic card to resume.The shaking of the rather unsightly video that I tried to remove by software, result inconclusive, I think I should invest in a stabilizer. Once I solve the problem of focus which does a little what it wants, I am with 2 remaining problem. I go little by little having everything to learn in the job. I started a few days ago to focus on the realization of photo/video with objective to make, among other things, light rewiew.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |